Financial Dashboard

The financial operating layer for firms using STAR.

Replace repeated STAR exports with fast, frozen, navigable financial views for WIP, net billings, collections, AR, budgets, and historical analysis. Review the firm through the dimensions that matter, then move from firm-wide rollups to client and engagement detail instantly.

Built for STAR • frozen periods • configurable dimensions • budget / CY / PY / PTD / YTD context • summary-to-detail navigation

What firms get immediately


WIP, Net Billings, Collections, and AR in one place

Frozen periods with optional live daily refresh

Navigate by firm structure, client hierarchy, and custom dimensions

Move from summary to client and engagement detail

Stop rebuilding STAR reports by hand

Most firms do not have a lack-of-data problem. They have a reporting-friction problem.

The numbers exist in STAR, but turning them into something the firm can actually review often means repeated exports, spreadsheet stitching, manual cleanup, and side-by-side reconciliation. By the time the reporting is ready, too much effort has already gone into preparing the numbers instead of reviewing them.
Financial Dashboard removes that reporting treadmill. It gives the firm one fast, consistent financial operating view so partners, managers, operations leaders, and leadership can spend less time assembling reports and more time working from them.

What changes in practice

Less manual STAR report assembly

Fewer side spreadsheets and one-off workbooks

Faster review of WIP, net billings, collections, AR, and budgets

Shared numbers across partners, managers, operations, and leadership

Easier movement from summary to detail

Historical periods preserved as they were

Built on your practice management data.

Configured to match your firm.

Financial Dashboard starts with the core financial numbers coming out of STAR and turns them into a fast, frozen, navigable reporting environment.
STAR remains the system of record. Financial Dashboard becomes the place where the firm reviews, compares, and works through those numbers without rebuilding the same reporting around them.
It is built primarily for firms using STAR, while also allowing data from CCH ProSystem fx Practice Management, IRIS Practice Engine, and other practice management systems to be incorporated where the starting financial data exists.

Configured to match your firm, not the other way around

The platform supports standard STAR dimensions and can also use client-specific custom fields in the navigation hierarchy, so the reporting model reflects how your firm actually organizes and reviews the business.

Common navigation lenses

Industry, Office, Service line, Entity, Franchise

Employee (Partner, Manager, Supervisor)

Client hierarchy (Parent/Child relationships)

Standard STAR dimensions

Custom STAR fields (Firm-specific hierarchies)

See the financial picture in one place

Financial Dashboard brings together the core views firms repeatedly need to review: WIP, Net Billings, Collections, and AR.
Instead of assembling multiple STAR reports just to get to a usable starting point, firms can work from one environment where the key financial views are already aligned and ready to review.
For Net Billings and Collections, firms can also compare Budget, CY, PY, PTD, and year-to-date context through the selected period.

Core operating views

WIP

Net Billings

Collections

AR

Context in the same view

Move between current performance, targets, prior-year context, and historical comparison without jumping across separate reports.
Budget
CY
PY
PTD
YTD through selected period

Move from firm-level signal to client and engagement detail

Financial Dashboard is not a static dashboard. It is a navigable financial workspace built to follow the firm from summary into the underlying detail.
Start at the firm level, choose the lens that matters, and move directly into the part of the business that needs attention. At broader levels, the lower pane can show ranked views such as Top 10 clients by WIP, Net Billings, Collections, or AR.
At more specific levels, the view naturally shifts from ranked summaries into detail grids such as Client Folder Details, then into child-client and engagement or project-level records.

How the progression works

Start with the firm-wide picture

Choose the hierarchy or role perspective

See ranked views where ranking makes sense

Shift into detail where detail makes more sense than ranking

Move into child-client and engagement or project records

Stay in the same reporting environment the whole time

Fast enough to use live.

Stable enough to trust historically.

Financial Dashboard is built on pre-compiled views, so navigation feels immediate and the reporting experience stays fast even as users move through the hierarchy.
That matters because firms do not need another tool that slows the conversation down. They need one that lets them review the numbers while the discussion is happening, not wait for reports to rebuild.
At the same time, closed periods can remain frozen, so the firm can always go back and see what the numbers were at that time. For open periods, firms can use a live-view approach with daily prior-day refreshes, and hourly generation where appropriate.

How the refresh model works

Pre-compiled views for fast navigation

Closed periods remain frozen

Open periods can refresh daily using prior-day data

Hourly generation is also possible

Many firms prefer daily frozen review for stability and consistency

Bring more of your financial reporting into one place over time

Financial Dashboard is not limited to standard STAR-only views. The lower reporting area can support custom panels that bring additional reporting into the same operating environment.
That means firms can compare outside data sources, such as ADP, against STAR measures like Net Billings and review them within the same period structure and navigation model.
Over time, Financial Dashboard can become the place where firms stop gluing spreadsheets together manually and start reviewing more of their financial reporting in one automated, historically preserved workspace.

What can expand over time

Third-party reporting panels

ADP and similar external data sources

Comparisons against STAR measures such as Net Billings

Additional lower-pane analytical views

More reporting needs in one preserved environment

Why this matters

Fewer disconnected workbooks

Less repeated spreadsheet glue work

More reporting in one review flow

Shared periods and historical consistency

A clearer path from reporting to action

What makes it operationally useful

Financial Dashboard is not just easier to look at than manual STAR reporting. It is more usable in practice.
It gives firms one place to review the numbers, move through the business by the structure that matters, preserve historical periods, compare targets and performance, and follow questions all the way into the underlying detail.
That is what makes it useful day to day for partners, managers, operations leaders, finance teams, and leadership. It shortens the distance between reporting and action.

Replaces repeated reporting work

Spend less time exporting, stitching together, and rechecking STAR reports by hand.

Supports real day-to-day use

Useful for partners, managers, operations, finance teams, and leadership — not just executive review meetings.

Keeps targets and performance together

Review budgets, current year, prior year, PTD, and YTD context in the same flow as actual performance.

Preserves history credibly

Frozen periods keep historical analysis stable even when the firm’s structure changes later.

Follows the firm’s actual structure

Use standard dimensions, custom fields, and firm-specific hierarchy design to reflect how your firm really operates.

Turns review into follow-through

Move from firm-level rollups into ranked views, client detail, and engagement or project records without rebuilding the path manually.

FAQ

Answers to the practical questions firms usually have when evaluating how Financial Dashboard fits into their current STAR reporting process.
Does Financial Dashboard replace STAR?
Is this just another BI dashboard?
Can it match our firm’s structure?
Can it use our custom STAR fields?
What does “frozen period” mean?
How current can the data be?
Can we compare budget, current year, and prior year?
Can users get from summary to detail?
Is this only for leadership meetings?
Can outside data be added too?
Do we need to change our STAR setup to use it?

See Financial Dashboard in the context of your firm

Review how your current STAR reporting process could be turned into a faster, frozen, navigable financial operating layer.
We can walk through how Financial Dashboard would map to your firm’s structure, reporting needs, and review workflow — from core STAR reporting to the dimensions, comparisons, and detail paths your team actually uses.
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.